Live and Let Die, by Ian Fleming
Jan. 20th, 2009 12:21 amThis second Bond book was quite hard to read, primarily, I think, because it was a product of its time.
The problem is that a good chunk of it is set in New York and on the East Coast, and that it centers on black culture. Or, rather, the problem is that writing from 1954 (or thereabouts) and from the UK, Ian Fleming has a terribly stereotypical view of American black culture at the time.
I don't believe that Fleming was intending to be racist, but his writing would certain come across as such today. One of the biggest annoyances is that he uses a pretty offensive black dialect (not that I ever like dialect, mind you), and the other is that he seems to envision that many or most blacks are engaged in some big Voodoo criminal conspiracy.
Let me just say, bleh.
And also let me just say, today being what it is, my god how far we've come in 54 years.
The book beyond that is OK to good. It feels a bit more like the Bond of the movies, as there are some gun battles and a big villain who explains his over-complicated death trap to Bond. There's also some nice tension and a very good finale.
However, the actual Bond is still a bit different: he's willing to admit fear. However, it looks like he might be one more step toward the womanizing of the movies; we'll see what happens to this book's "true love", who actually survives to the end of the book.
I talked to Donald about the ethnic stereotypes in this book and he said, "Wait until you get to the one set in Japan."
And glancing at the synopsis of the movie "adapted" from this book, I'm humored to see that it enjoyed a totally different type of ethnic stereotyping: it was released right in the middle of the blaxploitation era.
I really gotta run through the movies some time after I've read the books.
The problem is that a good chunk of it is set in New York and on the East Coast, and that it centers on black culture. Or, rather, the problem is that writing from 1954 (or thereabouts) and from the UK, Ian Fleming has a terribly stereotypical view of American black culture at the time.
I don't believe that Fleming was intending to be racist, but his writing would certain come across as such today. One of the biggest annoyances is that he uses a pretty offensive black dialect (not that I ever like dialect, mind you), and the other is that he seems to envision that many or most blacks are engaged in some big Voodoo criminal conspiracy.
Let me just say, bleh.
And also let me just say, today being what it is, my god how far we've come in 54 years.
The book beyond that is OK to good. It feels a bit more like the Bond of the movies, as there are some gun battles and a big villain who explains his over-complicated death trap to Bond. There's also some nice tension and a very good finale.
However, the actual Bond is still a bit different: he's willing to admit fear. However, it looks like he might be one more step toward the womanizing of the movies; we'll see what happens to this book's "true love", who actually survives to the end of the book.
I talked to Donald about the ethnic stereotypes in this book and he said, "Wait until you get to the one set in Japan."
And glancing at the synopsis of the movie "adapted" from this book, I'm humored to see that it enjoyed a totally different type of ethnic stereotyping: it was released right in the middle of the blaxploitation era.
I really gotta run through the movies some time after I've read the books.