Before Democratic Presidential hopeful Howard Dean got skunked in Iowa last week he wasn't receiving a lot of national attention other than the fawning commentary about how he would be the Democratic candidate.
Now, following that and his enthusiastic speech the same night, he has been getting attention of all sorts. And it's a good thing. What's become more and more obvious to me in the last week is that Dean isn't actually the "Democratic wing of the Democratic party" as he self-proclaims. He was smart enough to be the first guy out the door complaining about Bush's immoral war, but looking back at record in Vermont he's a centrist. He's done some great things, like signing civil union bills for gays and lesbians in Vermont, but he's quite fiscally conservative ... and sometimes otherwise conservative too.
Thus I wasn't too surprised when
angelovernh posted a link to this article. The skinny: Dean wants to make computer manufacturers require a national ID before you can login to your computer. Thus, everything you do on your computer and on the 'net is tagged with your personal, unique, non-anonymous signature.
It'd be presented, no doubt, as a convenience for users. You know, "Never have to type your address information again." And a good portion of this country will fall for it, not realising that their personal liberties are being eroded day by day.
Me, I work in the online game industry, and anonymous users can be a serious, serious problem sometimes. But there's no way I'd fight that by requiring digital fingerprints for every transaction, no more than I'd want every American's body to be emdedded with a unique broadcasting ID, so that we could easily identify and capture criminals in the "real world".
After reading more about Dean in the last week, I'd become fairly happy that his campaign had gone into freefall. After reading this, I've got my fingers crossed that it continues.
Now, following that and his enthusiastic speech the same night, he has been getting attention of all sorts. And it's a good thing. What's become more and more obvious to me in the last week is that Dean isn't actually the "Democratic wing of the Democratic party" as he self-proclaims. He was smart enough to be the first guy out the door complaining about Bush's immoral war, but looking back at record in Vermont he's a centrist. He's done some great things, like signing civil union bills for gays and lesbians in Vermont, but he's quite fiscally conservative ... and sometimes otherwise conservative too.
Thus I wasn't too surprised when
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
It'd be presented, no doubt, as a convenience for users. You know, "Never have to type your address information again." And a good portion of this country will fall for it, not realising that their personal liberties are being eroded day by day.
Me, I work in the online game industry, and anonymous users can be a serious, serious problem sometimes. But there's no way I'd fight that by requiring digital fingerprints for every transaction, no more than I'd want every American's body to be emdedded with a unique broadcasting ID, so that we could easily identify and capture criminals in the "real world".
After reading more about Dean in the last week, I'd become fairly happy that his campaign had gone into freefall. After reading this, I've got my fingers crossed that it continues.